Comments on: Is Scala the New Ruby? http://blog.proudcloud.net/2009/05/is-scala-is-the-new-ruby/ BLOG Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:23:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: awekill http://blog.proudcloud.net/2009/05/is-scala-is-the-new-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-12 awekill Mon, 25 May 2009 18:31:29 +0000 http://blog.proudcloud.net/?p=289#comment-12 btw, see the comments on http://unlimitednovelty.com/2009/04/twitter-blaming-ruby-for-their-mistakes.html Alex Payne said: "I sound like a pretty unreasonable guy filtered through the tech press and Reddit comments, but I hope less so in my own words." btw, see the comments on http://unlimitednovelty.com/2009/04/twitter-blaming-ruby-for-their-mistakes.html

Alex Payne said: “I sound like a pretty unreasonable guy filtered through the tech press and Reddit comments, but I hope less so in my own words.”

]]> By: awekill http://blog.proudcloud.net/2009/05/is-scala-is-the-new-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-11 awekill Mon, 25 May 2009 18:24:18 +0000 http://blog.proudcloud.net/?p=289#comment-11 twitter is not quitting ruby, they just rewrote their backend in scala which is completely fine. btw, their backend was starling which is known to be slooooooow twitter is not quitting ruby, they just rewrote their backend in scala which is completely fine.
btw, their backend was starling which is known to be slooooooow

]]> By: jau http://blog.proudcloud.net/2009/05/is-scala-is-the-new-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-10 jau Sat, 23 May 2009 22:44:46 +0000 http://blog.proudcloud.net/?p=289#comment-10 Nope, it's not new Ruby (which is also nothing new after Lisp). Scala is a lot better. It is Ruby closures, pure OO system and great static type system which takes what is best in Java (reliable refactorings and a LOT of test cases you don't have to write). Nope, it’s not new Ruby (which is also nothing new after Lisp). Scala is a lot better. It is Ruby closures, pure OO system and great static type system which takes what is best in Java (reliable refactorings and a LOT of test cases you don’t have to write).

]]>